A hermeneutic phenomenology

DRAFT

A hermeneutic phenomenology--inductive, dialectical, iterative, reflexive process for producing a phenomenological description

DATA

Review claimed account(s) of a phenomenon

Construct a preliminary definition/description/example of the phenomenon to use as a beginning tool for inclusion

Apply this delimitation to the account(s) selected

Sort accounts based on direct-experience ("re-creation") or about-experiencing ("report")

Select the richest account(s) for inclusion

BRACKETING

Identify, set aside, account for all biases and assumptions with reference to the phenomenon

Detail the inquirer's interest and participation in the phenomenon

Place the inquirer into the mix of what the phenomenon is and how it is experienced

As appropriate, include the inquirer's experience of the phenomenon into the mix of accounts

CODING

Place each account into, for example, a table and separate into meaning units (e.g., sentences)

Code the units as to relevancy to, boundaries of, and themes or theme clusters belonging to the phenomenon as at this stage understood

Note all invariant statements

Set aside units not part of the phenomenon

TAXONOMY AND MATRIX

Paraphrase each account using qualities and features

Build each paraphrase into a narrative of each account and elaborate meanings based on original language

Confirm each narrative as a textual representation of the phenomenon under study yet lifted from the specific context for each original

Determine if each narrative compares favorably with the preliminary understanding used as a basis for inclusion in the inquiry

Determine if each narrative compares favorably with the coding of qualities and features as drafted thus far

Adjust paraphrases, narratives, and coding so that there is  consistency between and among these

Confirm accuracy of depiction between the results and the original accounts

Draft a matrix of qualities and features of the phenomenon and posit a taxonomy for same to be used in subsequent views and reviews of the themes and structure of the phenomenon

DESCRIPTIONS

For each narrative write a textural description

Consider consistency, coherence, etc., among all sources of reference (preliminary conceptualization, original account, coding, paraphrase, narrative) until a point of satisfactory "correspondence" is achieved

For each narrative write a structural description

Include movement between and among themes in terms of parts and whole, their relationships and dynamics (e.g., chronology, action (plot), logic, etc.)

Consider the structure's consistency, coherence, etc., among all sources of reference (preliminary conceptualization, original account, coding, paraphrase, narrative) until a point of satisfactory "correspondence" is achieved

Adapt descriptions as necessary using most accurate terms, understandings, and textures to this point

SYNTHESIZING

Combine structural and textural descriptions for each account

Compare with each account and the taxonomy-matrix developed from the above refinements

Compare themes and descriptions

Refine each to set a matrix

Using the resulting taxonomy write a structural-textural description for each account

SYNTHESIS

Create one textural-structural description

De-contextualize as needed ("lift the phenomenon out of the particular")

Illustrate the phenomenon as necessary

Refine the description so that it is clear on what is experienced and how it is experienced

Assess the final description for inclusiveness and accuracy among all aspects and stages of its development